Skip to main content

Table 2 Optimization of the model reaction using Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4 under reflux (I) and ultrasound irradiation (II) in watera

From: Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4-promoted synthesis, cytotoxic evaluation, molecular docking, and MD simulation of some indenopyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives

Entry

Method I (∆)

Method II (US)

Catalyst/(g)

Catalyst/(g)

Time (min)

Yield (%)b

Time (min)

Yield (%)b

1

none

none

120

35

20

40

2

Fe3O4@SiO2/0.10

Fe3O4@SiO2/0.10

30

55

10

60

3

nano-Fe3O4/0.10

nano-Fe3O4/0.10

30

70

10

75

4

SnCl4·SiO2/0.10

SnCl4·SiO2/0.10

50

60

12

70

5

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.005

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.005

45

75

7

80

6

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.010

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.010

40

85

4

90

7

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.020

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.020

30

85

3

94

8

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.030

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.030

20

88

2

98

9

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.040

Fe3O4@SiO2-SnCl4/0.040

20

88

2

98

  1. a4-Cl-benzaldehyde (1 mmol), 1,3-indanedione (1 mmol), 6-amino-2-(alkylthio)pyrimidin-4(3H)-one (1 mmol) in water (8 mL) at 70 °C
  2. bIsolated yields