BMC Chemistry

Table 2 Determination of ERG, PRO, CAF, CAM, and MEC in the calibration and validation set of the suggested methods

From: Simultaneously quantifying a novel five-component anti- migraine formulation containing ergotamine, propyphenazone, caffeine, camylofin, and mecloxamine using UV spectrophotometry and chemometric models

		CLS					PLS					MCR-ALS
		ERG	PRO	CAF	CAM	MEC	ERG	PRO	CAF	CAM	MEC	ERG	PRO	CAF	CAM	MEC
Calibration set	MEAN	99.65	100.14	100.89	100.41	99.38	99.69	99.99	100.88	100.12	99.49	99.96	99.86	100.32	99.94	99.56
	SD	1.550	1.522	1.110	1.566	1.414	1.293	1.340	1.117	1.385	1.272	0.679	1.083	0.837	0.807	0.823
	%RSD	1.555	1.520	1.100	1.560	1.423	1.297	1.340	1.107	1.383	1.279	0.679	1.085	0.834	0.807	0.827
	RMSEC^a	0.087	0.456	0.231	0.178	0.104	0.079	0.415	0.210	0.162	0.094	0.072	0.378	0.191	0.147	0.086
Validation set	MEAN	100.12	100.64	100.82	99.79	100.32	100.07	100.41	100.82	99.94	100.10	100.10	100.14	100.31	99.89	99.99
	SD	0.517	1.472	1.255	1.452	0.78	0.310	1.143	1.260	1.243	0.370	0.182	0.526	0.603	0.664	0.108
	%RSD	0.516	1.463	1.245	1.455	0.778	0.310	1.138	1.250	1.244	0.370	0.182	0.525	0.601	0.665	0.108
	RMSEP^b	0.093	0.487	0.249	0.189	0.112	0.085	0.443	0.226	0.172	0.102	0.077	0.404	0.205	0.156	0.093

^aRoot Mean Square Error of calibration
^bRoot Mean Square Error of predication

Back to article page

ISSN: 2661-801X

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com